WHY COACHING?
By Hazri Rohilio
Coaching is not for everyone. As a matter of fact, for some, being asked to get coaching may feel more like being told to get treated for an illness. If they had the choice, they would probably avoid it. Why?
Coaching is not for everyone. As a matter of fact, for some, being asked to get coaching may feel more like being told to get treated for an illness. If they had the choice, they would probably avoid it. Why?
Coaching, mentoring and counselling are
oftentimes confused between one and the other. In Malaysia, counselling
services have long been established in schools and learning as well as social
institutions as a way of providing emotional support to students. The
connotation for counselling is that you needed “extra help” to get through.
Counselling intervention also usually occurs as a reactive action a result of
an undesirable behaviour or a measure to avoid disciplinary action. Coaching (and mentoring) is different as it is
meant to heighten performance. Coaching intervention is arranged to elevate the
performance of an individual so that s/he can perform his task better. If you
could imagine a young junior sprinter who shows potential to beat his time,
what intervention would you offer – coaching or counselling?
The example just shared refers to sports
coaching, just to illustrate the point on how to differentiate coaching and
counselling. While we are probably more familiar with sports coaching, there are
also business coaching and life coaching. Coaching is defined as a “thought provoking” and “creative process” between a coach and an
individual, that results in “inspired
actionable” steps. The words
captured in captions are powerful elements that need to be achieved in each
meaningful coaching event. Let us try to
break them down so they make sense. Coaches use powerful questions as a tool to facilitate the coaching process.
Thought provoking questions can help reset
our present thinking and help us push to another level of thought. But this can
only be done with the right pre-conditions. Any self-respecting coach will gain
permission and establish trust from the coachee to embark on the coaching
process. A good coach will focus on
connecting. Once there is
connection, the coachee may feel as if “two minds are working as one” in coming
up with actionable options for the coachee. This is where the coach uses his
skill to help the coachee come up with creative
ways to offer possible solutions to an issue.
What are the challenges to coaching?
Remember what defines coaching - thought provoking and creative process. Coaches have the task ahead of them to make sure that they are prepared to deliver expected outcomes of the session. Good coaches would ask themselves, “how do I make this session beneficial for the coachee?” and prepare accordingly carefully. While the coach will need to use all in his skills to achieve this, the judge of the coaching value rests only with the coachee and the coachee alone. If the coachee doesn’t feel stimulated, moved or motivated over the course of the coaching intervention, there will be no outcome. A coach that does not help get the targeted outcomes for his coachee may not have claim to the job any longer. Think about it, why would you continue to have a coach in this situation?
I did not explain how mentoring is different
to coaching earlier but to round it off, let us briefly go into the differences
between the two. A mentor usually is
a more senior person who uses his knowledge and experience to help guide a
younger person to learn the ropes and move up the organisation at an
accelerated pace. With the help of the
mentor, the apprentice will have the
benefit of foresight and experience. A mentor-mentee relationship may develop an
emotional bond whereby the mentee will benefit from having someone who takes an
interest in the long-term development of his/her career. There are great mentor-mentee relationships
that we know of, for example, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. Organisations set up mentoring programmes to provide support for potential
young leaders to get guidance as they navigate the workplace and work
themselves up the corporate ladder, though too often it is assumed that because
you assume a senior post you are qualified to mentor someone lower down the
ranks. However, the landscape for mentoring is evolving, with the changing
needs.
Now, I have had the good fortune to have
learned a lot from people whom I have worked for – I’ve worked directly under
three CEOs who took me under their wings. They all took the trouble to mentor
me and I have learned a great deal from them especially on what it means to be
a leader. But the ones who coached left me with the best leadership learnings.
This gave me the confidence and what I needed to come into my own. My
leader-coaches gave me the latitude to choose my own path through empowerment. Why this worked best is because I learn much
more from experience than through other means.
To support this, studies have shown that the most significant learnings
result from on the job training or from work experiences.
A mentor who is trained as a coach can use
coaching techniques to help the mentee break through new grounds, not confined
only by the wisdom of the mentor. This
would inevitably be an added dimension to any mentor-mentee relationship. In this rapidly changing day and age, the
pace of change in the workplace today compared to 10 years ago is like night
and day. Knowledge does not rest solely with the wise anymore. Billions bits of new information flow
everyday, through the internet in particular, making it virtually impossible for
us to cope with it. What we may have
known 1 year or 1 week or 1 day ago may not necessarily be applicable today.
Putting this into perspective, the traditional mentoring method, as we know it,
of imparting wisdom to the young wide-eyed apprentice, may just be a thing of
the past.

Comments
Post a Comment